欢迎光临《计算力学学报》官方网站!
陈凯,钱基宏.随机振动问题的广义坐标合成法[J].计算力学学报,2012,29(2):171~177
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
随机振动问题的广义坐标合成法
The generalized coordinates synthesis method for the random vibration analysis
投稿时间:2010-09-11  修订日期:2011-10-24
DOI:10.7511/jslx20122004
中文关键词:  随机振动  完全二次型组合  广义坐标合成法  虚拟激励法  谐波激励法
英文关键词:random vibration  complete quadratic combination (CQC) method  generalized coordinates synthesis (GCS) method  pseudo-excitation method (PEM)  harmonic-excitation method (HEM)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(50878202)资助项目.
作者单位E-mail
陈凯 中国建筑科学研究院, 北京 100013 chenkai@cabrtech.com. 
钱基宏 中国建筑科学研究院, 北京 100013  
摘要点击次数: 2996
全文下载次数: 1850
中文摘要:
      工程中的随机振动分析多采用完全二次型组合法(CQC)及其改进算法,如虚拟激励法(PEM)和谐波激励法(HEM)。广义坐标合成法(GCS)提出了一种计算随机响应的新思路,其基本原理是将物理空间的计算转移到自由度较小的振型空间进行,从而缩减了计算量和计算规模。对于较大规模结构体系的随机振动问题,GCS方法计算响应协方差矩阵的计算量只相当于PEM的2r/sT,其中s、rT分别为激励功率谱矩阵的秩、振型总数和离散频率点数。此外,对于给定激励时程的问题,由于GCS方法直接求解广义坐标运动方程,因而可以方便得出响应时程。通过对几种方法的详细对比,说明对于大多数只需要求解响应方差的随机振动问题,GCS是最优的计算方法。PEM只有在s<r且必须求得响应功率谱的条件下才能获得较高的计算效率,而HEM实际上等同于s=1的PEM。
英文摘要:
      The complete quadratic combination (CQC) method as well as its improved forms,such as the pseudo-excitation method (PEM) and the harmonic excitation method (HEM),is the most common approach to solving the random vibration problem in the engineering application.The generalized coordinates synthesis (GCS) method provides a new approach to accomplishing the random vibration analysis.It conducts the calculation in the modal space firstly and then derives the results to the physical space.Due to the less independent dimensions in the modal space,the calculation amount to obtain the response covariance matrices is significantly reduced.The ratio of the computational efforts between the GCS method and the PEM is only 2r/sT,where s,r and T represent,respectively,the rank of the excitation power spectral density (PSD) matrix,the number of the modes and the total number of the discrete frequency points.Besides,for the random vibration described by the excitation time history the GCS method directly solves the dynamic equations of the generalized coordinates so that the response time history can be calculated handily by the mode superposition.The comprehensive comparison of the different methods shows that the GCS method is the best method for most of the random vibration problems.The PEM will be more efficient only if the response PSD matrices are required and s<r.The HEM is in fact equivalent to the PEM with s=1.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
您是第12828596位访问者
版权所有:《计算力学学报》编辑部
本系统由 北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计