欢迎光临《计算力学学报》官方网站!
刘佩,姚谦峰.采用重要抽样法的结构动力可靠度计算[J].计算力学学报,2009,26(6):851~855
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
采用重要抽样法的结构动力可靠度计算
Dynamic reliability calculation based on importance sampling method
投稿时间:2007-09-17  
DOI:10.7511/jslx20096016
中文关键词:  重要抽样  动力可靠度  单元失效域  方差放大系数  功率谱
英文关键词:importance sampling  dynamic reliability  elementary failure regions  amplificatory factor of variance  power spectral density
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(50578011,50878021);北京交通大学优秀博士生科技创新基金(141053522)资助项目.
作者单位
刘佩 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044 
姚谦峰 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044 
摘要点击次数: 1745
全文下载次数: 1294
中文摘要:
      首次对比分析了结构动力可靠度计算的三种重要抽样法,并对部分方法进行了补充修正。单元失效域法补充了依据随机数决定抽样区间的产生方法,根据单元失效域的条件概率和权重系数给出重要抽样密度函数。方差放大系数法直接通过激励过程的特性给出重要抽样密度函数的具体表达式。功率谱法的重要抽样密度函数仅为激励幅值的函数,根据结构反应的功率谱密度增大激励幅值的方差,建议幅值样本值的联合概率密度函数可表示为幅值样本值分量的概率密度函数的连乘形式。结果表明:对于线性体系三种方法的计算效率均比Monte-Carlo法有显著提高,而单元失效域法的计算效率又比另两种方法高。
英文摘要:
      Three importance sampling methods for dynamic reliability calculation are compared for the first time. Some complement and modification are made to the original three methods. The first approach is a new approach named elementary failure regions method. The method of generating random numbers is proposed. Importance sampling density function is proposed according to conditional probability density functions of elementary failure regions and the weights. The second approach presents detailed importance sampling density function through amplificatory factor of variance and character of the excitation. The amplification of variance can increase the chance of structural failure. Only the amplitudes of the excitation are generated with importance sampling density function for the third approach. The power spectral density of the structural response is used to augment variances of amplitudes. Joint probability density function of amplitude sample is suggested to equal to the product of probability density functions of amplitude sample elements. Characters of the three approaches are compared through an example. The results show that the calculation efficiency of each of the three approaches is much higher than Monte-Carlo method. Calculation efficiency of the first approach is the best.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
您是第13576913位访问者
版权所有:《计算力学学报》编辑部
本系统由 北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计