欢迎光临《计算力学学报》官方网站!
王景焘,于长平,刘凯欣.几种差分格式对于流体弹塑性模型的适应性分析[J].计算力学学报,2006,23(1):1~6
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
几种差分格式对于流体弹塑性模型的适应性分析
A feasibility analysis of several numerical schemes for solving hydro-elastic-plastic problems
  修订日期:2004-02-23
DOI:10.7511/jslx20061001
中文关键词:  流体弹塑性  CE/SE方法  CIP方法  MUSCL格式  Roe格武
英文关键词:hydro-elastic-plastic,conservational equations,CE/SE,CIP,Roe,MUSCL,
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划);中国科学院资助项目
王景焘  于长平  刘凯欣
北京大学力学与工程科学系,北京100871
摘要点击次数: 1829
全文下载次数: 13
中文摘要:
      通过模拟弹性介质和流体中的强间断传播,分析了守恒元/解元(CE/SE)、立方插值伪质点法(CIP)、Roe格式以及二阶Godunov方法(MUSCL)四种格式对流体弹塑性问题的适应性,发现CE/SE方法和MUSCL方法较为优越。利用CE/SE方法模拟了爆炸焊接形成的波状界面问题,印证了CE/SE方法在处理流体弹塑性问题上的优越性。
英文摘要:
      In this paper,the feasibilities for hydro-elastic-plastic model with four famous fluid dynamics numerical methods,namely,CE/SE,CIP,Roe and MUSCL are investigated.The mechanical process involving strong discontinuity in elastic mediums and the one-dimensional shock tube problem are simulated,by using the four methods.By analyzing the numerical results carefully,one could preliminarily conclude that CE/SE method and MUSCL method are better for solving hydro-elastic-plastic problems.Due to the clear physics concepts in the construction process and the higher-resolution,CE/SE method is the most suitable for computing hydro-elastic-plastic problems in the four schemes.To test the capability in detail,CE/SE method is also performed to simulate a hydro-elastic-plastic problem,which is the wavy interface generation process in explosive welding of steel-copper plates and aluminum-copper plates.The computational results are very similar to the experimental ones.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
您是第12828956位访问者
版权所有:《计算力学学报》编辑部
本系统由 北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计